This was probably a trick to inform the plugin that it was launched from the Fusion hub and not directly. Why ? Because an additional parameter was needed on the command line : a “-i” parameter had to be inserted between the executable name and the filename. exe directly from the host application didn’t work. At the beginning there was the “Fusion” thing that worked as a hub and was itself calling the requested plugin. Many years ago, I published some information about how Topaz Labs plugins had to be launched from an host application. Sorry for the wall of text and thanks for any input. Is there some way to keep Photolab or Topaz from creating a blank 8byte tif file or to have them automatically update the initial exported tif instead of creating another? Also is there some way to keep dxo from appending _DxO to files that are exported to application? (I don’t see that option, unlike export to disk). So I guess my question really is, is this how it’s supposed to work or am I missing something. All of this really slows down the workflow, especially if I’m trying to work in batches. So in the end I need to go and remove these 8byte blank tif files and then rename my exported jpg because it has had both DxO and TMP appended to its filename. Afterwards I’m left with a _dxo.tif that is only 8 bytes in size and for some reason doesn’t get removed as well as a _DxO-tmp.tif and its dop file. So this “tmp” tif is the one I need to export to jpg that has my edits. When I make my edits in topaz and return to dxo another tif is created (instead of replacing the first one) so now I also have a file_DxO-TMP.tif. DXO creates the tif to export to application but doesn’t allow me to remove the dxo suffix when exporting to application, so I have a file_DxO.tif. Finally, I go to export the edited tif to a jpg for consumption.Īt this point I have kind of a mess of files. I make my edits and click apply and am sent back to photolab. The tif exports and then opens up in topaz sharpen ai. So what I normally do for example is develop my raw files in photolab, then use the export to application option to export a 16bit. I was wondering if anyone had experience with this, as I’ve noticed a few quirks. DxO PhotoLab is a lot like that.Hello, I had some questions about the workflow of Photolab 3 and topaz plugins together. ![]() Other times, the learning curve is a breeze, and you instantly get it. It takes a while for the penny to drop, and you finally develop the necessary knowledge to optimise your workflow. Sometimes that learning curve is steep and frustrating, especially when all you want to do is apply some quick edits. If you’ve used any photo editing software in the past, you’ll have no doubt experienced a learning curve before you got comfortable with its nuances. The folks at DxO have developed a complete photo editing and image management platform that instantly surprised me – in a good way. ![]() One thing I love about this gig is the ability to bring new and exciting products to your attention. Use coupon code SHOTKIT to save 15% Check Current PriceĪs a writer for Shotkit, I get to review all kinds of photography-related products – including file management and editing software. Powerful and intuitive image editing with a vast array of intelligent adjustments, one-click effects, and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |